The Overworked And Lonely Rabbi.
Next: The Overstretched Synagogue
Up: Synagogue Transformation Revisited and
Previous: Synagogue Transformation Revisited and
In a series of focus groups throughout the country conducted by STAR in its
formative year, several concerns were repeated by rabbis of every stripe
and affiliation. They decried that they were overworked, underappreciated,
and were expected to do too many things. Some of these rabbis are
extraordinarily talented and creative; some are charismatic and founders of
wonderful synagogues; some work in large multi-staffed institutions, others
in smaller communities or synagogues; no matter - the plaint was
consistent. It is not to be dismissed lightly.
The complaint of many rabbis, that they are overworked, does not play
well with lay people. This is not because rabbis don't work hard but
because so do the lay people. Most people work 10-20 hours more each week
than they did 15 years ago, and they also volunteer at their synagogue and
elsewhere during the shrinking disposable time that they have left.
It is a terrible indictment of American society that we celebrate "24/7"
and that we brag about our not taking our due vacations Most Rabbis do
work hard and long but they are respectably well paid professionals facing
similar pressures to those facing their congregants. And, in fact, many
rabbis have far more discretion over their own time than do those who are
employees in the business world. It is more than appropriate for
synagogues, through rabbinic leadership, to address lifestyle issues - for
rabbis and for their congregants - and to explore ways to ameliorate the
pressures which emerge from them. But it is not convincing to focus on the
amount of work.
A more real and important challenge is the absence of priorities and
clarity of vision for the congregational rabbinate. It is simply
unreasonable to assume that any professional can do everything well. Some
rabbis may be great teachers; others are inspiring preachers; still others
are caring counselors; and still others excel at community building. What
rabbis and synagogues must accept is their own limitations. If no one
rabbi can do everything well, what other ways or resources exist to make
sure that the rest is done well? For example, bikur cholim [visiting the
ill] is not a commandment only for rabbis; it is for all. Teaching and
leading teens is a rare and precious skill, not necessarily one learned or
taught at Seminaries. Many congregations are blessed with highly educated
congregants whose Jewish knowledge and speaking skills may exceed that of a
particular rabbi who, in turn, may be unmatched in his/her community-
building and community relations acumen.
When we begin to unpack the expectation that one person can be all and do
all, we can move to clarity of mutual expectation. It is a sobering but
ultimately liberating exercise for both sides; both rabbis and
congregations will be the stronger for addressing this dilemma.
Which leads to a more structural issue, the issue of rabbinic loneliness.
I have often wondered why rabbis should be expected to have their offices
within the synagogue. An office within a synagogue surely emphasizes the
rabbinic centrality to that place but it underscores their aloneness. Why
don't we have rabbinic suites for rabbis from several synagogues, perhaps
with other professionals? These suites could be in centrally located
business or shopping areas, making them more easily accessible to most
congregants. For the congregant, it would probably make consulting with
the rabbi a more convenient and less symbolically loaded experience.
As most other professionals know, working in an office with peers has many
benefits. It can help remove the sense of isolation. Not incidentally,
this new collegial relationship can help keep rabbis informed about
innovations, the strengths and insights of colleagues, and might well lead
to new kinds of collaborations. Rabbis and their synagogues would be the
better. And while some might worry that this would have a negative impact
on the unique and special relationship between rabbis and congregants, I
believe that this greater accessibility would enhance that bond.
My suggestion stems from observations of other professionals and from my
own experience. Early in my career, I worked on campuses for 14 years. I
made it a point to maintain an office with the other chaplains as well as
one at Hillel. Even though it was a mere two short blocks between the two,
it was miles in terms of approachability. Over the years, literally
hundreds of students and faculty found their way to the chaplains' offices,
in the center of campus. Right or wrong, many were reluctant or too
intimidated to seek me out in the confines of what was even then a very
active and thriving Hillel House. And I benefited from the daily contact
with other professionals who had comparable responsibilities but different
skills and personalities from my own.
Next: The Overstretched Synagogue
Up: Synagogue Transformation Revisited and
Previous: Synagogue Transformation Revisited and
Excelsior Computer Services
Tue Mar 4 09:41:36 EST 2003